Entry tags:
In search of a new sci-fi show, we started watching Sanctuary
I know there are a number of people on my flist who really like this show, so please take my opinion with, you know, all suitable disclaimers (IMHO, to each their own, and so forth), but as of Sanctuary 1x03, I'm finding it hilariously awful.
The budget is apparently, like, nothing, which really isn't the show's fault, but does lead to lots of gigglefit-inducing moments like Ashley chasing Druitt in a warehouse full of guns with one l'il pistol, or the mooks in the Morrigan episode that looked like bad Halloween costumes and totally had that whole not-at-all-menacing B-movie lurking thing going. (Note to the Cabal: You may be an Ancient Organization of Evil (TM), but ... it's 2008! Battle technology has advanced beyond slow-moving unarmed creatures with no fighting skills! I'M JUST SAYING.)
More annoyingly, the characters are idiots, and the science!fail and shoddy research is on the level of a bad fanfic, such as Will saying that the bubonic plague was last seen in Scotland in 800 AD. (... so the Black Death never made it to Scotland, I guess? FOR GOD'S SAKE LEARN TO USE GOOGLE, WRITERS.) The dialogue often has that cringe-inducing "bad Renfaire" sound as in the worst Stargate episodes, and omfg, if Will was any denser, the man would spontaneously collapse into a black hole. And what is up with Ashley, supposedly their badass fighter, getting taken hostage and having people get the drop on her and just generally lacking the common sense of a mushroom ...?
It's not enough to just tell me that characters are smart and competent! You have to actually SHOW them being smart and competent too! As it is, they basically win their fights because the bad guys and monsters just stand there and let themselves be attacked, a la Old Skool Doctor Who.
Despite, or perhaps because of the general silliness of it, I'm finding it very entertaining anyway. The more overblown and melodramatic the characters get, the less seriously I can take them, and I do enjoy the silly B-movie moments (at times, it's hard to tell if the writers are doing it as a deliberate nod to old monster movies, or if this really is, god help them, the best they can do). And every once in a while there'll be something that genuinely is funny or clever. I can't help liking Henry, and I want to like Amanda's character because, well, it's Amanda (although ... the accent ... *cries*). But mostly, I go back and forth between being entertained by its mockability and annoyed by its implausibility, I suppose.
So ... does the show actually get better later on? Or do you just have to be willing to accept it for the cute-but-very-silly thing that it is? XD
This entry is also posted at http://friendshipper.dreamwidth.org/302145.html with
comments.
The budget is apparently, like, nothing, which really isn't the show's fault, but does lead to lots of gigglefit-inducing moments like Ashley chasing Druitt in a warehouse full of guns with one l'il pistol, or the mooks in the Morrigan episode that looked like bad Halloween costumes and totally had that whole not-at-all-menacing B-movie lurking thing going. (Note to the Cabal: You may be an Ancient Organization of Evil (TM), but ... it's 2008! Battle technology has advanced beyond slow-moving unarmed creatures with no fighting skills! I'M JUST SAYING.)
More annoyingly, the characters are idiots, and the science!fail and shoddy research is on the level of a bad fanfic, such as Will saying that the bubonic plague was last seen in Scotland in 800 AD. (... so the Black Death never made it to Scotland, I guess? FOR GOD'S SAKE LEARN TO USE GOOGLE, WRITERS.) The dialogue often has that cringe-inducing "bad Renfaire" sound as in the worst Stargate episodes, and omfg, if Will was any denser, the man would spontaneously collapse into a black hole. And what is up with Ashley, supposedly their badass fighter, getting taken hostage and having people get the drop on her and just generally lacking the common sense of a mushroom ...?
It's not enough to just tell me that characters are smart and competent! You have to actually SHOW them being smart and competent too! As it is, they basically win their fights because the bad guys and monsters just stand there and let themselves be attacked, a la Old Skool Doctor Who.
Despite, or perhaps because of the general silliness of it, I'm finding it very entertaining anyway. The more overblown and melodramatic the characters get, the less seriously I can take them, and I do enjoy the silly B-movie moments (at times, it's hard to tell if the writers are doing it as a deliberate nod to old monster movies, or if this really is, god help them, the best they can do). And every once in a while there'll be something that genuinely is funny or clever. I can't help liking Henry, and I want to like Amanda's character because, well, it's Amanda (although ... the accent ... *cries*). But mostly, I go back and forth between being entertained by its mockability and annoyed by its implausibility, I suppose.
So ... does the show actually get better later on? Or do you just have to be willing to accept it for the cute-but-very-silly thing that it is? XD
This entry is also posted at http://friendshipper.dreamwidth.org/302145.html with
no subject
Try skipping forward to "The Five," maybe? If that doesn't do it for you, this just may not be your show. (The special effects do get marginally better, but you'll continue to need an ability to pretend that silly special effects don't look silly. Or to take them as enjoyably cheesy.)
no subject
no subject
I’ve enjoyed episodes but I do find it quite hard to suspend disbelief when I watch it, between the ropey special effects, storylines et cetera It’s a series where I want more substance. It’s a lemon tart and when I want filet mignon. But you’re right there’s hardly any series out there which are emotionally and intellectually satisfying. Hence the reason for fanfic.
That being said, any episode which has Tesla in, is worth watching, as Jonathon Young (Parrish in SGA) enjoys himself thoroughly when he pops up and acts his little socks of in gleeful abandon.
I really really quite dislike the term ‘abnormal’ and all that it implies, as if the abnormals are some sort of second class race that needs looking after by the superior
Sam CarterHelen Magnus (which in itself is a superior term). By the definition of abnormal in the Sanctuary!verse, Magnus is an abnormal as is the Daniel Jackson look-a-like Will, but since they appear to be most Homo sapien cue a lack of angst on their part, while Henry Foss gets to angst (but I can’t say anymore for spoilers).no subject
*blinks* I agree I wish they'd chosen a term besides "abnormal", which I just handwave by saying the term was chosen back in the Victorian age by Helen's father and not changed with the times. But I'm pretty sure Magnus totally admits she is an abnormal, and I'm also pretty sure Will is not an abnormal (sometimes tedious character, yes, but not abnormal by the show's definition). At least, I've watched every episode they've aired and, except for that one really bad S1 episode, he's never been indicated as anything but "normal." I also never felt like "abnormal" was considered a bad thing in the universe - I mean, look how many Sanctuary heads are abnormals themselves?
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I really really quite dislike the term ‘abnormal’ and all that it implies, as if the abnormals are some sort of second class race that needs looking after by the superior Sam Carter Helen Magnus (which in itself is a superior term).
Yeah, I definitely had that problem, too -- not so much with the term itself (though I can definitely see what you're saying) as with Helen's whole "I will come in and save you from yourselves by locking you up and studying you!" thing. It reminded me a lot, actually, of the Fablehaven books -- someday I need to make a post about those books, and the many MANY problems I had with them -- except that Fablehaven was far more blatantly skeevy and less subtextual about the main characters' patronizing attitude towards the magical world. Helen ... I think that (fanwanking like mad here *g*) her approach makes a great deal of sense for someone who was born in the Victorian era and grew up in that world, with that mindset, and the way the show handles it is ... less disturbing than it could be, I guess? Granted, I'm only three episodes in and it may get worse, but the Jekyll/Hyde guy being in the elevator indicates to me that all but the actual "worst of the worst" can voluntarily enter and leave their cells, which was the biggest problem I had with the general setup in the beginning (and with Fablehaven, overall, which is a similar kind of setup except that they actually are prisoners).
I'm not really trying to excuse the show, so much as I can kind of see how the "Sanctuary" might have developed along these lines, since I assume Helen is the one who built it -- which doesn't make it totally problem-free, of course, but ... it would be interesting to see those issues of terminology and agency and so forth dealt with on the show (though I'm assuming, since you're saying this, that they never will be ...).
as is the Daniel Jackson look-a-like Will
Ahahaha, I'm glad we're not the only ones who saw that! He's SO much like a young Michael Shanks from some angles, it's uncanny.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Oh, hey, that's an interesting way of looking at it. I don't have an issue with stage productions either, where standing on a tall box equals standing on a cliff, but I've never tried translating that to film/television. After 15 years of Star Trek and Stargate, I'm spoiled enough to expect props to look believable.
But Sholio keeps comparing Sanctuary to Torchwood, which a friend tried to show me and which made me cringe a lot, so I dunno.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm so glad you wrote this! I'm afraid I don't find it entertaining. I don't begrudge anyone the enjoyment (and indeed wish I shared), but the Morgan episode was about the last straw for me. I gave it a couple more tries at random times (okay, the Michael Shanks episode was not "random"), but I couldn't enjoy it. I cannot stand Will.
It's not enough to just tell me that characters are smart and competent! You have to actually SHOW them being smart and competent too!
Yes!
no subject
I'm happy for people who like it! I'm going to give some later episodes a try and see if it picks up; it's all streaming on Netflix, so I have the whole darn thing at my fingertips anyway. I want to like it, because I really want a new scifi/fantasy show to enjoy, but so far it really is not doing it for me.
no subject
I promise later the characters get increasingly smart and competent. I'd say try to make it through season one (only 13 episodes - some of which are very good (I'd say "The Five" and "Requiem" (OMG AMANDA IS AWESOME) are the best, along with the season finale) and some of which are important info bits for later.
As for Amanda's accent, it kinda drives me crazy when people complain about that, so I'm going to give you my standard response. Amanda can do an authentic British Accent. She purposely makes Helen's accent off because she's accounting for the 100+ years Helen spent traveling the world and living in places other than Britain, and how that would affect her accent.
Pretty much, the genuinely funny and clever gets more common, Henry becomes a main character (OMG HENRY!), and you will, I think, grow to like Helen a lot. It just, well, most shows are pretty rocky the first few episodes. You do have to allow for the effects to be cheesy sometimes, though those get better also.
Also...I think Damian Kindler, judging by his Stargate episodes, and Sanctuary, is one of those writers who is very good at big interesting ideas, but less good on the follow-through and the little details. A number of S1 and S2 episodes left me thinking "I really liked a lot of that, but I feel like one more run around the editing room would have elevated it from "I really enjoyed that" to "that was a really well-told story"" So...yeah. S3, though? Damn.
Um. I rambled a lot. Does that help?
no subject
So if you're finding it entertaining now, it shouldn't be too hard to give it a bit more of a chance.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Since then, I've only seen a couple episodes. It was amusing enough (Paul's character is particularly hilarious- that must be so much fun to play), but I couldn't really get into it, sadly. I want to! So many of the actors are people I absolutely love!
Frustrating. :)
no subject
no subject
A while ago, I ran into a fan's list of how you *should* watch it, which is not the order of airing, and completely skips some of the more lamentable episodes. I've been meaning to try to find that again, and see if it is more cohesive in that order, because it's got a lot of promising premise, and I feel like I ought to like it.
no subject
no subject
And then, what with the convention and the f-list, I decided to force myself to watch S2, and I've been enjoying the eps I've seen much much more. The budget is still craptastic and the FX bug me, but when they're not trying to throw champagne parties on beer budgets, it's quite enjoyable. Or, at least, no more cringeworthy than, say, SGA was.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I'll give some more episodes a try. I guess it helps to not expect it to be great TV, and just enjoy it for the cheesy, low-budget fun of it.
no subject
But boredom and staying up until the wee hours has coaxed me into giving the new episodes a chance. And though the cheese is still there I have to say there is quite a lot of improvement. I'm still not sucked into it, but it's a fun popcorn show for when I need something to watch and I'm starting to really enjoy the characters.
But that's the thing about shows, isn't it? You can't judge a book by its cover and you can't really judge a show by its first season. There are so many shows where the first season left me "meh" but after struggling through that first season I eventually found myself so sucked in I became almost obsessed with the show. SGA, White Collar, Haven, Dr. Who (both ten and eleven) - I started off indifferent or unsure, now I love them to pieces.
no subject
There haven't been very many shows that really grabbed me in the first episode or two, come to think of it. SGA actually did -- not the premiere, but the two episodes after it hooked me good. But, really, that's an exception; usually it's a slow burn, and I need to start giving more shows a chance and not just giving up after a couple episodes.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I like Tapping's accent (at least modern-day), but if it makes you cry, just wait until you hear her father. ::shudder::
I somehow stuck with it because others seemed to like it, or claim it got better, and I had the time to waste. And every few episodes I'd decide to quit, only to think I might as well finish out the season. (Such as here (http://michelel72.livejournal.com/67984.html) — 2x07 - 2x09.)
I know a lot of folks are saying they love season 3. I thought "Bank Job" was actually well done (http://michelel72.livejournal.com/90252.html) ... but that just reminded me that they are capable of much better than they usually accomplish, and since then I've been even more dissatisfied. They perpetuate Stargate-verse annoyances (http://michelel72.livejournal.com/89008.html), too (3x01, not really spoilery).
I only watch at this point to enjoy the snarkiness of a few of the actors, and to mock, these days. (To myself; I'm trying to cut down on my squee-harshing. But you asked!)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Methos!Peter Wingfield is there as John Watson; he's another actor I'm willing to sit through really bad stuff just to watch and listen to, plus Helen's dad is Joe from Highlander (as someone said, his accent is . . . not good, but I still love him).Anyway, I go in with very low expectations just to see actors I like and wouldn't otherwise get to see. I really respect how hard Tapping works and how she's created this show out of pretty much nothing, and she gives her friends opportunities to work, too. The rest I just handwave, mute, or fastforward through. It works for me!
no subject
... whoa, Jim Byrnes is in this? I fangirl the heck out of him! I think this has made me more intrigued to keep watching than anything else I've heard about the show so far. *g*
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject