sholio: (Avatar-upbeat attitude)
Sholio ([personal profile] sholio) wrote2010-12-06 10:18 pm
Entry tags:

In search of a new sci-fi show, we started watching Sanctuary

I know there are a number of people on my flist who really like this show, so please take my opinion with, you know, all suitable disclaimers (IMHO, to each their own, and so forth), but as of Sanctuary 1x03, I'm finding it hilariously awful.

The budget is apparently, like, nothing, which really isn't the show's fault, but does lead to lots of gigglefit-inducing moments like Ashley chasing Druitt in a warehouse full of guns with one l'il pistol, or the mooks in the Morrigan episode that looked like bad Halloween costumes and totally had that whole not-at-all-menacing B-movie lurking thing going. (Note to the Cabal: You may be an Ancient Organization of Evil (TM), but ... it's 2008! Battle technology has advanced beyond slow-moving unarmed creatures with no fighting skills! I'M JUST SAYING.)

More annoyingly, the characters are idiots, and the science!fail and shoddy research is on the level of a bad fanfic, such as Will saying that the bubonic plague was last seen in Scotland in 800 AD. (... so the Black Death never made it to Scotland, I guess? FOR GOD'S SAKE LEARN TO USE GOOGLE, WRITERS.) The dialogue often has that cringe-inducing "bad Renfaire" sound as in the worst Stargate episodes, and omfg, if Will was any denser, the man would spontaneously collapse into a black hole. And what is up with Ashley, supposedly their badass fighter, getting taken hostage and having people get the drop on her and just generally lacking the common sense of a mushroom ...?

It's not enough to just tell me that characters are smart and competent! You have to actually SHOW them being smart and competent too! As it is, they basically win their fights because the bad guys and monsters just stand there and let themselves be attacked, a la Old Skool Doctor Who.

Despite, or perhaps because of the general silliness of it, I'm finding it very entertaining anyway. The more overblown and melodramatic the characters get, the less seriously I can take them, and I do enjoy the silly B-movie moments (at times, it's hard to tell if the writers are doing it as a deliberate nod to old monster movies, or if this really is, god help them, the best they can do). And every once in a while there'll be something that genuinely is funny or clever. I can't help liking Henry, and I want to like Amanda's character because, well, it's Amanda (although ... the accent ... *cries*). But mostly, I go back and forth between being entertained by its mockability and annoyed by its implausibility, I suppose.

So ... does the show actually get better later on? Or do you just have to be willing to accept it for the cute-but-very-silly thing that it is? XD

This entry is also posted at http://friendshipper.dreamwidth.org/302145.html with comment count unavailable comments.

[identity profile] penknife.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
I liked the premiere, so my opinion may not be helpful, but "Fata Morgana" is a silly episode. "Folding Man" is okay; "Kush" is better; "Nubbins" is pretty awful.

Try skipping forward to "The Five," maybe? If that doesn't do it for you, this just may not be your show. (The special effects do get marginally better, but you'll continue to need an ability to pretend that silly special effects don't look silly. Or to take them as enjoyably cheesy.)

[identity profile] jimandblair.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that you’ve summed it up to a ‘T’: B-movie craptasticness.

I’ve enjoyed episodes but I do find it quite hard to suspend disbelief when I watch it, between the ropey special effects, storylines et cetera It’s a series where I want more substance. It’s a lemon tart and when I want filet mignon. But you’re right there’s hardly any series out there which are emotionally and intellectually satisfying. Hence the reason for fanfic.

That being said, any episode which has Tesla in, is worth watching, as Jonathon Young (Parrish in SGA) enjoys himself thoroughly when he pops up and acts his little socks of in gleeful abandon.

I really really quite dislike the term ‘abnormal’ and all that it implies, as if the abnormals are some sort of second class race that needs looking after by the superior Sam Carter Helen Magnus (which in itself is a superior term). By the definition of abnormal in the Sanctuary!verse, Magnus is an abnormal as is the Daniel Jackson look-a-like Will, but since they appear to be most Homo sapien cue a lack of angst on their part, while Henry Foss gets to angst (but I can’t say anymore for spoilers).

[identity profile] amenirdis.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess the bad special effects don't bother me. I mean, I like stage plays where of course it doesn't actually look like a cruise ship or the middle of a moor or Paris. It doesn't have to. It's just a sketch to make my imagination work, even though what I'm looking at isn't a realistic set of a moor but just some boulders on stage with a smoke machine. I'm there for the acting and the story, and really the special effects are just window dressing.
leesa_perrie: two cheetahs facing camera and cuddling (Asgard)

[personal profile] leesa_perrie 2010-12-07 12:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I gave up on Sanctuary pretty early on - not sure when, but within the first few eps. I found Will rather annoying and struggled with the whole concept. It falls into a genre of sci-fi that I'm not really keen on. I think it was the creatures they came up against, and I hear there's a werewolf as well, and I'm just not comfortable watching things with vampires or werewolves in, no matter how family friendly or crazy daft! Not sure I can explain why, it's just the way I seem to be!!
aelfgyfu_mead: (helmet)

[personal profile] aelfgyfu_mead 2010-12-07 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Hahahahaha yes!

I'm so glad you wrote this! I'm afraid I don't find it entertaining. I don't begrudge anyone the enjoyment (and indeed wish I shared), but the Morgan episode was about the last straw for me. I gave it a couple more tries at random times (okay, the Michael Shanks episode was not "random"), but I couldn't enjoy it. I cannot stand Will.

It's not enough to just tell me that characters are smart and competent! You have to actually SHOW them being smart and competent too!
Yes!
ext_2207: (Default)

[identity profile] abyssinia4077.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Stay patient. The first season is pretty rocky, mostly because they got picked up at the last minute so pretty much had about 2 weeks to write, film, edit, and polish each episode. I find the goofiness of S1 charming, if ridiculous, but when it starts coming into its own it gets *good* (and, oh man, season 3 so far has been GOOD).

I promise later the characters get increasingly smart and competent. I'd say try to make it through season one (only 13 episodes - some of which are very good (I'd say "The Five" and "Requiem" (OMG AMANDA IS AWESOME) are the best, along with the season finale) and some of which are important info bits for later.

As for Amanda's accent, it kinda drives me crazy when people complain about that, so I'm going to give you my standard response. Amanda can do an authentic British Accent. She purposely makes Helen's accent off because she's accounting for the 100+ years Helen spent traveling the world and living in places other than Britain, and how that would affect her accent.

Pretty much, the genuinely funny and clever gets more common, Henry becomes a main character (OMG HENRY!), and you will, I think, grow to like Helen a lot. It just, well, most shows are pretty rocky the first few episodes. You do have to allow for the effects to be cheesy sometimes, though those get better also.

Also...I think Damian Kindler, judging by his Stargate episodes, and Sanctuary, is one of those writers who is very good at big interesting ideas, but less good on the follow-through and the little details. A number of S1 and S2 episodes left me thinking "I really liked a lot of that, but I feel like one more run around the editing room would have elevated it from "I really enjoyed that" to "that was a really well-told story"" So...yeah. S3, though? Damn.

Um. I rambled a lot. Does that help?
ext_2207: (Default)

[identity profile] abyssinia4077.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 03:05 pm (UTC)(link)
[Um, yeah, What I was trying to say in my just-awake ramble was that you haven't really seen any of the good episodes yet. I think the premiere is the strongest one you've seen, and pilots are rarely very good. I think if you can make it to the end of the season, and you haven't enjoyed it and the characters aren't drawing you at all, and you aren't intrigued by parts of it, then it isn't for you. But the characters get smarter, the facts get less implausible (though I still have moments, but the science isn't any worse than gateverse science) and the stories get tighter.]

So if you're finding it entertaining now, it shouldn't be too hard to give it a bit more of a chance.
ext_2207: (Default)

[identity profile] abyssinia4077.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I really really quite dislike the term ‘abnormal’ and all that it implies, as if the abnormals are some sort of second class race that needs looking after by the superior Sam Carter Helen Magnus (which in itself is a superior term). By the definition of abnormal in the Sanctuary!verse, Magnus is an abnormal as is the Daniel Jackson look-a-like Will, but since they appear to be most Homo sapien cue a lack of angst on their part, while Henry Foss gets to angst (but I can’t say anymore for spoilers).

*blinks* I agree I wish they'd chosen a term besides "abnormal", which I just handwave by saying the term was chosen back in the Victorian age by Helen's father and not changed with the times. But I'm pretty sure Magnus totally admits she is an abnormal, and I'm also pretty sure Will is not an abnormal (sometimes tedious character, yes, but not abnormal by the show's definition). At least, I've watched every episode they've aired and, except for that one really bad S1 episode, he's never been indicated as anything but "normal." I also never felt like "abnormal" was considered a bad thing in the universe - I mean, look how many Sanctuary heads are abnormals themselves?

[identity profile] mirabile-dictu.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Tesla is Parrish! Holy cats, I had no idea! Wow, talk about two different characters. *boggles* That guy's good.
ext_2207: (Default)

[identity profile] abyssinia4077.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
The extra awesome bit is that before Sanctuary the actor spent several years, and won lots of awards, playing Nikola Tesla in a play about Nikola Tesla. So he's done a ton of research about the actual historical figure.

I don't know if that helps make him awesome or not, but one of my Sanctuary rules of thumb is "if Tesla is in the episode, it'll probably be awesome"

[identity profile] padfootthegrim.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 04:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Funny story: My first exposure to Snactuary: drunk at a friend's house, half asleep, I'm playing around on YouTube (back with the show was all webisodes). I hadn't heard of Sanctuary yet, and I came across a vid that, in my half asleep, drunk state, I don't understand. There's Lorne (I think?), and Carson, and Sam Carter with dark hair and an accent and Carson doesn't look right but I didn't realy understand what was going on and I wondered if it was some elaborate fan vid but that didn't make sense to me and I kept wondering and half watching and being very confused and then I fell asleep. When I woke up, I couldn't find the vid again, and I wasn't sure if I'd really seen it or if I'd just dreamed it. It was a few weeks later that I ran across Sanctuary on the internet again (I was sober this time, lol) and figured out what it was.
Since then, I've only seen a couple episodes. It was amusing enough (Paul's character is particularly hilarious- that must be so much fun to play), but I couldn't really get into it, sadly. I want to! So many of the actors are people I absolutely love!

Frustrating. :)
ext_3626: (sanctuary - gate)

[identity profile] frogspace.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
The extra awesome bit is that before Sanctuary the actor spent several years, and won lots of awards, playing Nikola Tesla in a play about Nikola Tesla. So he's done a ton of research about the actual historical figure.

I had no idea! That makes it even better. :D

but one of my Sanctuary rules of thumb is "if Tesla is in the episode, it'll probably be awesome"

Yes, that!!! And it helps that Methos Peter Wingfield is one of The Five as well. *g* I think what I like most about Tesla is that he respects Helen so much. ♥
ext_3626: (sanctuary - gate)

[identity profile] frogspace.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
(and, oh man, season 3 so far has been GOOD)

"For King and Country" had me flailing madly all over the place. So good! *flails some more* The last few minutes I almost forgot to breathe. *_*

[identity profile] jimandblair.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Terminology is important the word “Abnormal” has means and connotations in the English language.

abnormal, unnatural (not normal; not typical or usual or regular or conforming to a norm) "abnormal amounts of rain"; "abnormal circumstances"; "an abnormal interest in food" OR abnormal (departing from the normal in e.g. intelligence and development) "they were heartbroken when they learned their child was abnormal"; "an abnormal personality" wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn.

Normal and abnormal are such relative terms. The writers could have picked another term e.g. cryptid. I’m surprised Will doesn’t object to the usage, if it a hold over from Magnus’ Victorian roots.

Yes, Magus does identify as an “abnormal”. My understanding was that Will has a hyper-perception skill, similar to but not as evolved as Dr. Watson’s ability, but is considered a gift/abnormal. And that is what brought him to Magnus’ attention in addition to his mother’s death.

>I also never felt like "abnormal" was considered a bad thing in the universe -

We have a series where those that are abnormals are often incarcerated largely to protect “society” and for their own protection.

> look how many Sanctuary heads are abnormals themselves?

This intrigued me. I found the Sanctuary wiki and there’s an approx 50:50 human:abnormal ratio. One could argue, why are there humans Heads? Or what is an appropriate structure given that the Sanctuary appears to be democratic in structure with respect to representation. Are telepaths allowed? I’ll be writing fanfic next…

[identity profile] ellenmillion.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I really, really, really wanted to like this show, but spun out in the middle of season 1.

A while ago, I ran into a fan's list of how you *should* watch it, which is not the order of airing, and completely skips some of the more lamentable episodes. I've been meaning to try to find that again, and see if it is more cohesive in that order, because it's got a lot of promising premise, and I feel like I ought to like it.

[identity profile] jimandblair.livejournal.com 2010-12-07 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought Tesla on Sanctuary was a lot of fun, so I checked to see who the actor was and: low and behold it's Parrish! I think that he is a good actor; he put so much into Parrish’s short appearances on SGA.
tielan: (SGA - humour)

[personal profile] tielan 2010-12-07 05:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I watched through S1 and it didn't grab me. At all. I think I watched up to Episode 1.12 with a friend pretty much dragging me along, and was all "okay, um, well...I've watched it? (can I pls go now?)"

And then, what with the convention and the f-list, I decided to force myself to watch S2, and I've been enjoying the eps I've seen much much more. The budget is still craptastic and the FX bug me, but when they're not trying to throw champagne parties on beer budgets, it's quite enjoyable. Or, at least, no more cringeworthy than, say, SGA was.

Page 1 of 3