Entry tags:
I have any number of icons that would be hilariously inappropriate for this topic
I ran across an interesting link today on how/whether to write about periods (as in, women having them):
http://madelineashby.com/?p=1492
(detailed discussion of bodily fluids, as one might expect)
This reminded me of the time menstruation came up as a topic on a worldbuilding/spec-fic mailing list I used to be on circa 1996 or so. One of the guy writers on the list asked the women to weigh in on how they felt about fictional depictions of menstruation. Mainly he wanted to know if female readers are thrown out of the story if it's not mentioned, and did we feel it would plausibly affect a female character's ability to ride/fight/etc to a degree that should be mentioned for realism?
IIRC, the eventual consensus (which I think is pretty reasonable) was:
- The range of female experience is so incredibly broad that almost anything is at least plausible;
- It isn't noticeable (to most readers) if it's not mentioned;
- Writing it awkwardly or gratuitously is a lot more jarring to most readers than not writing it at all.
In other words, what we ended up with was: no need to write it if you aren't comfortable with the topic or just don't care, but it adds a bit of realism if you do mention it occasionally (especially if they're in a situation where it might plausibly come up, like trapped somewhere or out in the field for months) and there's enough individual variation that you can basically get away with whatever your plot needs.
Anyway, I don't agree with everything at the above link (in particular the implication that a writer has to mention it for realism, which is very much not my belief), but it has some interesting discussion, especially in the comments. I was particularly interested by the comment which mentions that female cycle-syncing is largely a myth, which has certainly been my experience.
What do you think? Have you ever mentioned it in a story yourself, or seen it done well? Would you write it? Is there a scenario you think is usually done poorly that could be done better?
http://madelineashby.com/?p=1492
(detailed discussion of bodily fluids, as one might expect)
This reminded me of the time menstruation came up as a topic on a worldbuilding/spec-fic mailing list I used to be on circa 1996 or so. One of the guy writers on the list asked the women to weigh in on how they felt about fictional depictions of menstruation. Mainly he wanted to know if female readers are thrown out of the story if it's not mentioned, and did we feel it would plausibly affect a female character's ability to ride/fight/etc to a degree that should be mentioned for realism?
IIRC, the eventual consensus (which I think is pretty reasonable) was:
- The range of female experience is so incredibly broad that almost anything is at least plausible;
- It isn't noticeable (to most readers) if it's not mentioned;
- Writing it awkwardly or gratuitously is a lot more jarring to most readers than not writing it at all.
In other words, what we ended up with was: no need to write it if you aren't comfortable with the topic or just don't care, but it adds a bit of realism if you do mention it occasionally (especially if they're in a situation where it might plausibly come up, like trapped somewhere or out in the field for months) and there's enough individual variation that you can basically get away with whatever your plot needs.
Anyway, I don't agree with everything at the above link (in particular the implication that a writer has to mention it for realism, which is very much not my belief), but it has some interesting discussion, especially in the comments. I was particularly interested by the comment which mentions that female cycle-syncing is largely a myth, which has certainly been my experience.
What do you think? Have you ever mentioned it in a story yourself, or seen it done well? Would you write it? Is there a scenario you think is usually done poorly that could be done better?

no subject
no subject