sholio: Tosh, Ianto, and Gwen (Torchwood-team)
Sholio ([personal profile] sholio) wrote2020-09-14 01:42 am

Torchwood spoiler discussion post

You know, I've been discussing this weird, iddy show in various comment threads in various places and I know a number of people who follow me have watched it or are watching it - so let's have a central discussion post. There will be spoilers for all seasons of the show in the comments.

If you have an observation on the show, anything you want to say - say it here. :)

Meanwhile I'll just use the comments to stash some of my own observations.
sheron: RAF bi-plane doodle (Johns) (Default)

[personal profile] sheron 2020-09-14 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It'd be interesting to figure out what specifically about it makes it work so well for you (I mean besides what you've already talked about). I bet in about 5+ years you'll be in another fandom "just like this one" and then it'll be like "oh you know, in retrospect it makes sense" XD
sovay: (I Claudius)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-14 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
They also seem to, uh ... actually not even recognize that the Owen-related issues that people chewed over endlessly back in 2008 ARE issues, which is downright wild to me.

Unpack?
sheron: RAF bi-plane doodle (Johns) (Default)

[personal profile] sheron 2020-09-14 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I have also been very very pleasantly surprised by not seeing much of "this is a toxic/abusive relationship" in my current fandom! Could it be tumblr might move on from this idea just due to how long it has flogged that particular horse? We shall see.
sovay: (Rotwang)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-15 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
And also, just in general - I mean, it does depend on who's in the fandom, and Tumblr Torchwood fandom in general seems to be pretty chill and nice.

I'm glad to hear it!

(Much of the rest of this answer reminded me why I try to avoid fandom discourse per se and just talk about things with friends whose opinions, however like or unlike mine, I generally trust. In 2020, I would if anything have expected race to play a more prominent part in fannish analysis and for viewers to have become even less okay with the alien roofies, and the entire thing about the m/m kiss in "Captain Jack Harkness" as straight female eye candy makes my brain go bzzzpft, especially in light of #ownvoices. Harshing on the Cyber-bikini is completely fair. Who knew that being technologically upgraded gave you permanent silver high heels?)
Edited 2020-09-15 00:32 (UTC)
rachelmanija: (Default)

[personal profile] rachelmanija 2020-09-15 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
This is fascinating but I have to say that I'm really sad that a lot of current fandom thinks Jack kissing the other Jack is bad for gay people. (It is definitely unrealistic for the time period but I don't go to Torchwood for historical realism.) I literally don't understand why they think that's problematic but kissing Ianto isn't. Because it's in public?

I'm also surprised about the non-reaction to the alien roofies. I actually wonder if part of that is what I think is the same reason why the writers didn't see it as roofies, which is that IIRC Owen sprayed himself, not the other people. It's morally the same thing, but the specific action is doing something to himself, not to others.
sovay: (Jonathan & Dr. Einstein)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-17 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I actually wonder if part of that is what I think is the same reason why the writers didn't see it as roofies, which is that IIRC Owen sprayed himself, not the other people.

I just chalked it up to the similar blind spot that fantasy narratives have about love spells: they are not traditionally viewed as coercive. (I have no idea why. Ancient Egyptian magical practice classified them as such.)
scioscribe: (mcu: gamora)

[personal profile] scioscribe 2020-09-15 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm surprised--although pleasantly so!--that there's not a lot of current discourse about Jack/Ianto having a pronounced age gap/power differential, now that I think about it; I wonder if the people most likely to be upset by this tend to react more virulently to non-canon ships than canon ones. Or it could also just be that, as you said, it depends on who's in the fandom, and no one currently in it is interested in yelling at people about shipping. In which case, good for them! Because this is definitely a show that, for me, benefits from a lot of cheerful acceptance of the fact that any of these people might bang any of the others at any time. It's the Torchwood way.
trobadora: (Torchwood)

[personal profile] trobadora 2020-09-15 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
This is absollutely fascinating for me! I observed Torchwood fandom from the edges while it was airing and haven't checked in since then, and wow, that's a LOT different from what I might have expected.

Depressing about the Jack/Jack kiss, though. Seriously? Ugh. Especially the "female wish fulfilment" - are they so invested in what women want or like being bad that who created it, or the context in which it exists, don't matter at all?!
sartorias: (Default)

[personal profile] sartorias 2020-09-14 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Like what issues? (Note: I have never seen any of the show, but I'm always curious about fan engagement, especially when it evolves)
sartorias: (Default)

[personal profile] sartorias 2020-09-14 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks! Really interesting stuff!
rachelmanija: (Default)

[personal profile] rachelmanija 2020-09-15 06:25 am (UTC)(link)
I just want to observe that someone suggested that different writers shipped different pairings, and specifically that there was a sort of writer's room ship war going on between the Jack/Ianto and Jack/Gwen shippers, and whether that's true or not, it made aspects of the show make so much more sense. I imagine the actors gamely committing to whatever the writers gave them, whether it was consistent with last week's motivations or not.
scioscribe: (Default)

[personal profile] scioscribe 2020-09-15 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I liked your mention of "messiness" in the discussion of what makes a canon spawn a (fic-writing) fandom, because Torchwood is kind of the poster child of that for me. It's got a lot of great aspects--that wall-to-wall queerness meant a ton to me when it was first airing (and is still a plus), the characters are intriguing and vivid, the stakes are high physically and emotinoally, the structure invites both arcs and monster-of-the-week fun, the team rapport and shipping prospects are all great, UNDEAD OWEN--interspersed with some "why would you make that choice?" bits that invite fix-its.

Even more than that, though, it's got--and we talked about this a lot when we were group-watching it--that sense of multiple personalities, where it would thrive as a monster-of-the-week show but not always be successful as a more serious, dark SF drama. So you get some interesting dissonance from that, because the show I, specifically, might be watching isn't always the show that the show thinks that it is, so you get choices made creatively that seem to either fulfill the promise of the show or break it, depending on which version of the show you're most in-tune with. And while that can understandably lead to rage-quitting--either at the end of season two or "Children of Earth," or, if you were really into the darkness and thought the show could do it well, when things seemed to occasionally work out too easily or without consequences--it can also provoke that fannish desire to unify the dissonance. To keep going with the team stuff after the show had abandoned it, or to sell the darkness and grimness in a way you find more convincing, or to unite both aspects in a way you find compelling. It's cool. And part of me wonders if you'd get the same enticements if you actually did split it up into two shows, one a serious, fatalistic look at people fighting darkness and gradually being consumed by it and one a goofier team show. Because I think something that makes it compelling to me is that feeling of "clair pockets in a noir universe," of the characters struggling to carve out a little place for themselves and their hopes and loves in the middle of a narrative that keeps pushing "we all die cold and alone" on them.
sovay: (Silver: against blue)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-16 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Because I think something that makes it compelling to me is that feeling of "clair pockets in a noir universe," of the characters struggling to carve out a little place for themselves and their hopes and loves in the middle of a narrative that keeps pushing "we all die cold and alone" on them.

That tension is essentially Torchwood for me—it rendered the show almost instant comfort viewing when I picked it up at the start of this month, because everyone is fucked up and no one gets out alive and even saving the day generally seems to come at a cost of collateral damage and yet the characters never stop fighting no matter how ridiculous or horrifying the odds and I stand by my early description of the show's vibe as a moderately violent, rather hurt/comfort-driven workplace comedy inhabited by disaster humans who will literally take bullets for one another but are still working their way toward emotional maturity with a map and a flashlight. Take out the goofiness, take out the darkness, it would be something different. It was something different. I'm a lot less interested in that.
Edited 2020-09-16 01:42 (UTC)
scioscribe: (Default)

[personal profile] scioscribe 2020-09-16 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
I stand by my early description of the show's vibe as a moderately violent, rather hurt/comfort-driven workplace comedy inhabited by disaster humans who will literally take bullets for one another but are still working their way toward emotional maturity with a map and a flashlight.

This exactly. I love this description so much, and it perfectly encapsulates the feeling of the show.
sovay: (Silver: against blue)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-16 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
This exactly. I love this description so much, and it perfectly encapsulates the feeling of the show.

Thank you!

This show turned out to be more or less exactly what I wanted to watch under current conditions, which it makes it all the more aggravating to me that it blew itself up. (I saw Children of Earth before the other seasons and I am indebted to it for interesting me in Peter Capaldi, but I have absolutely no desire to watch it at the present moment; neither have I even attempted Miracle Day. Understood if you feel differently.)
Edited 2020-09-16 03:27 (UTC)
sovay: (Renfield)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-16 06:03 am (UTC)(link)
Whyyyy couldn't they have given us another season or two of this team? The season two team dynamic in particular is such a filmed-fanfic feeling.

And it's flexible. It can encompass the sacrificial romance of "To the Last Man," the serious existentialism of "A Day in the Death," the splatter comedy of "Something Borrowed," and it all feels like the same show; there's none of the fuzziness, the whiplash, or the just plain nope of the first season finding (often by falling over) its feet. I don't understand jossing such a strong, multivalent ensemble just as soon as it's gelled. I especially don't understand carrying it through something as disruptive to the team as a death that turns into an undeath—it doesn't just change Owen, it changes how the team relates to him, and the end result is an even more bonded sense of stronger in the broken places—and then just dropping a nuclear plant on it. I am sure I would still have objected had it happened at the end of a third season, because I never like losing favorite characters, but it wouldn't have felt so arbitrarily fast. I think that's why I keep wondering if there were production factors, because narratively, whuh?
Edited 2020-09-16 06:07 (UTC)
sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-16 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I still wonder why you'd do something like that with a character, and then close off the possibility of any future storylines with that character just four episodes later.

Even leaving aside the (not minor) consideration of the team and their evolving relationships, it makes for some weird dropped threads, like whatever the deal is with Owen and the Weevils and the suggestion that Jack's eternally eleven-year-old Tarot-reader may be the resurrected Faith who was an earlier doorway for Death/Duroc and similarly fought it off. If I hadn't known that the show hit a wall at the end of the season, I would have expected that to be revisited in some future arc.

Also, at the risk of TMI or tedium: Owen is the sort of character it is valuable for me to see not just surviving but sometimes even thriving ("You ready to see that dead man dance, Tosh?") and I suspect in 2008 it would have hit like the wrong kind of ton of bricks to watch him commit to figuring out how to live with what's happened to him and then have the decision taken away from him after all.
Edited 2020-09-16 19:38 (UTC)
sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-17 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, in general, whether or not the writers intended it this way, I think the particular way that Owen's storyline hits my id (as a person with a disability myself) is as a disability narrative.

For me also. And specifically an invisible disability: Owen doesn't look dead. Unless you actually catch him cutting himself on a scalpel without bleeding or lighting himself up like a Christmas tree with a fistful of power cables, unless he trusts you enough to let you touch his room-temperature skin or listen to him when he's scared, there's nothing to tip you off that he's not just the ordinary grade of disaster person who looks good in leather jackets and probably couldn't make a good cup of coffee even when he was alive. He looks normal. He doesn't feel it. He's not. As a person who has been told ad nauseam, even kindly, that I never look like I'm in the amount of pain or exhaustion I am, I relate to that stupidly hard.

He dies for stupid, preventable plot reasons, but he goes out heroically while fighting like hell to save people and trying not to die. That is the one and only bit of credit I'll give the show for that ending, but it really isn't nothing.

I am glad the show knew that much at least.
sovay: (Viktor & Mordecai)

[personal profile] sovay 2020-09-17 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
but also, there really is a running thread of default background queerness on this show that's vanishingly rare on TV even now.

It was especially notable to me that it was not thematically important queerness—just canonically no one in the main cast is straight. (Maybe Rhys, but how do I know? We have exactly one relationship data point on him and it's Gwen.) I have gathered that the show took some flak for it at the time. I found it unironically comfortable.

But then again, if we'd gotten an entire season of Ianto at Torchwood One before it was destroyed, then Ianto joining Torchwood Three as the sole survivor of his former friend group would have actually been the tragic ending, rather than the start of the more optimistic story that it is in actual canon.

Having Ianto in the background of the Torchwood One episodes of Doctor Who would have been fascinating, though. (I doubt the production timeline would have accommodated it even if the idea had occurred to any of the writers, but it just occurred to me.)