Entry tags:
More Yuletide musings
You know, it seems like every year, there are some fandoms I offer to write because I'm wildly enthusiastic about them and they make me squee and bounce, and some fandoms that I offer because it's a book I really loved when I read it back in 1990, or a comic that's been running since 1954 of which I've read the 1986-89 issues only ... and invariably, that's what I'm assigned. XD I'm not really complaining, because I've found my assignments challenging and fun, but THIS year, "Self," I told myself, "don't sign up for anything you're not crazy about writing, okay?" And then, of course, I got to looking through the list of fandoms and going (as usual) "Oh! I've heard of that! I could probably write it!"
*reviews signup thoughtfully*
I keep wondering if I ought to come to my senses and delete some of these. Like, say, the series I stopped reading with book 3 because I'd lost interest in it. Or the one that I added because I thought the idea of fic for it -- I mean, the idea of fic actually existing -- would be hilarious, but it doesn't have any actual characters, and now that I'm looking at it, I'm thinking "... you know, trying to get 1000 words out of a series of unconnected jokes is probably a bad idea." On the other hand, winnowing my list down to my top 4 or 5 most squeeful favorites sort of feels like a cop-out. I dunno. (Okay, I think I'm taking that last one out. There's a difference between being challenged, and offering to write something that fills me with horror at the very idea. *edits*)
In other Yuletide-related stuff, I was pondering this post on Yuletide letters asking for no sexism/racism/etc in their fic. I've seen several people doing that this year, and I find myself agreeing that it doesn't sound like a terribly useful thing to ask for if you aren't specific. No one sets out to write sexist, racist, or homophobic fic, right? I think it's way more useful to specify what you mean: I wouldn't find "no misogyny" particularly helpful, but "Please don't shove the female characters into the background while the male characters get all the plot" gives me something to actually work with. (Which, incidentally, is more or less why I asked not to have canon couples broken up in my own Yuletide letter; I thought about getting more specific, but basically, it's not that I can't stand to read ANY story in which [x] and [y] are not together; it's that I hate the general trope of breaking up couples in order to shuffle the girl offscreen, which is almost invariably what happens. But I think that's a more useful way to phrase the request than just saying "No sexism" or even "Don't ignore the female characters", because a couple of my requests are for all-male characters and what is the poor writer supposed to do then?)
This entry is also posted at http://friendshipper.dreamwidth.org/299389.html with
comments.
*reviews signup thoughtfully*
I keep wondering if I ought to come to my senses and delete some of these. Like, say, the series I stopped reading with book 3 because I'd lost interest in it. Or the one that I added because I thought the idea of fic for it -- I mean, the idea of fic actually existing -- would be hilarious, but it doesn't have any actual characters, and now that I'm looking at it, I'm thinking "... you know, trying to get 1000 words out of a series of unconnected jokes is probably a bad idea." On the other hand, winnowing my list down to my top 4 or 5 most squeeful favorites sort of feels like a cop-out. I dunno. (Okay, I think I'm taking that last one out. There's a difference between being challenged, and offering to write something that fills me with horror at the very idea. *edits*)
In other Yuletide-related stuff, I was pondering this post on Yuletide letters asking for no sexism/racism/etc in their fic. I've seen several people doing that this year, and I find myself agreeing that it doesn't sound like a terribly useful thing to ask for if you aren't specific. No one sets out to write sexist, racist, or homophobic fic, right? I think it's way more useful to specify what you mean: I wouldn't find "no misogyny" particularly helpful, but "Please don't shove the female characters into the background while the male characters get all the plot" gives me something to actually work with. (Which, incidentally, is more or less why I asked not to have canon couples broken up in my own Yuletide letter; I thought about getting more specific, but basically, it's not that I can't stand to read ANY story in which [x] and [y] are not together; it's that I hate the general trope of breaking up couples in order to shuffle the girl offscreen, which is almost invariably what happens. But I think that's a more useful way to phrase the request than just saying "No sexism" or even "Don't ignore the female characters", because a couple of my requests are for all-male characters and what is the poor writer supposed to do then?)
This entry is also posted at http://friendshipper.dreamwidth.org/299389.html with

no subject
no subject
And yes, exactly! I suppose that it could provide the useful service of at least letting you know what your recipient's hot-button topics are; if I got a request that said "no misogyny", for example, I'd pay special attention to make sure I wasn't backgrounding the female characters or using the word "bitch" without thinking about it or whatnot (... well, I doubt if I would do that last one in a fic for someone I didn't know, but I guess it would depend on canon). But it would still be SO MUCH MORE USEFUL to have my recipient just say "I hate misogynist slurs and don't want them in my fic" or "I love the women in this canon, please make them awesome" or whatever.
no subject
And I completely agree--being specific on exactly what you do and don't want is much better than vague statements. It is much more useful to provide details and examples.
(I also read
no subject
It's true that the ratio of good fic to bad fic in Yuletide is incredibly high! But I wouldn't worry too much about it; another thing I like about Yuletide is how supportive everyone is -- when the fics come out, I've very rarely (maybe never?) seen people complaining about their fic, or pointing out fics they didn't like. Everyone is all SQUEE! BOUNCE! REC! instead. :D Probably it's at least partly because there is so much fic that even if your own personal fic isn't all you could've hoped, there is more than enough to read. I don't think there needs to be ... performance anxiety or anything of that nature about it. (Not that I don't get ridiculous performance anxiety myself. But, er ... do as I say, not as I do? *hides*)
no subject
no subject
You need an AO3 account to sign up for Yuletide. To get an AO3 account, you need an invite code. Right now they're saying that the invite queue is pretty long, so they're asking people to email yuletide@yuletidetreasure.org to request an invite code for Yuletide.
And then, once you have your account, you go to the Yuletide signup page here: http://archiveofourown.org/collections/yuletide2010/signups/new
There is also a page with really detailed instructions for filling out the signup form, including video, here: http://community.livejournal.com/yuletide_admin/106124.html
I hope this helps! :)
no subject
no subject
Not at all! Thanks in part to your encouragement, I'm now contemplating fandoms. I have three that I definitely want (including one that I almost certainly won't get), but choosing the fourth...gah. How to narrow it down?
And then I need to figure out my offers.
(I actually really love doing the whole sign-up thing--choosing prompts and descriptions and so forth. It gets me into trouble sometimes. :D)
no subject
no subject
no subject
But yes, I think putting down something more specific than 'no x-ist' is better. I've tried to be specific in a couple of things I've signed up for recently - possibly too specific, but I did put a 'so long as it's not on my dislike list I'll probably be fine with it - it's the giving not the receiving' sort of thing at the end for those who find too specific posts offputting!! *g*
t's that I hate the general trope of breaking up couples in order to shuffle the girl offscreen
Yes, although I don't read slash or much that could be classed as het, the idea of breaking up a relationship in order to shuffle the girl offscreen sounds just like the sort of thing I'd hate too!
no subject