Entry tags:
And here I wasn't going to post anything more on the LJ election, BUT
... I really have no words for this. I was going to try to back away from this whole LJ advisory election debacle for a while, but then I ran across this in a last bout of injudicious surfing, and the utter hypocrisy of it leaves me boggled.
In a very recent post at his journal, Jameth equates writing HP fanfic with pedophilia, basically in so many words. And then he hides behind:
No, of course not, YOU UNETHICAL ASSHOLE. Someone else said it (notice the complete lack of attribution, though, so we have only his word that he didn't write it), and he's just quoting it in a big block of text in his journal so that his voters can be "informed". No implications here, no subliminal smear advertising, nope, nothing like that.
I think what burns me up about this is the sheer hypocrisy of it. This man has been running his entire campaign on what basically amounts to a free-speech-ad-absurdum platform. His supporters are attacking people? They're just exercising their freedom of speech. You want to stop them, you're infringing their rights! So he should be all for
legomymalfoy's right to say or do anything she pleases in her journal, right? Sure, unless he can throw her and her fellow fanficcers (i.e. you and me) to the wolves and get some votes.
In the comments, someone asks him if he actually thinks fanfic=pedophilia, and he says:
There is no way that he can possibly NOT know about last year's whole thing with HP-related journals getting TOS'd. Also, I notice that he's not willing to commit to a viewpoint he might later have to back up if he actually did get elected. This is about the closest thing to a giant "screw you!" to fandom, and anyone who might have anything potentially TOS-able in their journals, that he can say without having to actually commit himself to something he can't weasel out of. Taking him at his word, too, it also means that his much-ballyhooed commitment to "free speech" doesn't extend to actually rocking the boat or standing up for the LJ users who supposedly represent his constituency. (So why is he running again? Oh wait. For fun and for trolling opportunities, apparently.)
It's probably not fair to call
jameth specifically anti-fandom, since it looks more like he's simply willing to pander shamelessly to the anti-fandom crowd to get votes. But he sure as heck isn't willing to stand up for us. As a fannish user of the site, and as a user of it in general, I do not believe that he is qualified to represent our interests to LJ in any sort of advisory capacity. At this point, I feel that having him on the advisory board would do us much more harm than good.
He'll invoke "free speech" right and left to defend his friends' trolling and name-calling, but he'll turn right around and "out" someone else for their own socially-unacceptable hobby, as long as it gets him some votes, notoriety or attention. And he'll do it while hiding behind a curtain of weasel-words and spin -- it's not HIM saying these things, just some anonymous person he's quoting! It's not HIS fault, it's just some other person saying these mean things that he's repeating. If he's acting like this during the campaign, why would he behave any differently once he's elected? Please, please vote.
In a very recent post at his journal, Jameth equates writing HP fanfic with pedophilia, basically in so many words. And then he hides behind:
Also, please note that I am blockquoting by surrounding the text with a fine black line and indenting it to indicate that I am quoting from elsewhere and that I am not indicating that any of this is fact or fiction. I'm just pointing out what I'm seeing so that users/voters can be informed of their choices.
No, of course not, YOU UNETHICAL ASSHOLE. Someone else said it (notice the complete lack of attribution, though, so we have only his word that he didn't write it), and he's just quoting it in a big block of text in his journal so that his voters can be "informed". No implications here, no subliminal smear advertising, nope, nothing like that.
I think what burns me up about this is the sheer hypocrisy of it. This man has been running his entire campaign on what basically amounts to a free-speech-ad-absurdum platform. His supporters are attacking people? They're just exercising their freedom of speech. You want to stop them, you're infringing their rights! So he should be all for
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
In the comments, someone asks him if he actually thinks fanfic=pedophilia, and he says:
I don't think my personal viewpoints on the subject are relevant since I wish to represent all users regardless of whether we share similar interests. What's relevant here is whether the content is allowed by LiveJournal ToS, and if it is, I would welcome it with open arms.
There is no way that he can possibly NOT know about last year's whole thing with HP-related journals getting TOS'd. Also, I notice that he's not willing to commit to a viewpoint he might later have to back up if he actually did get elected. This is about the closest thing to a giant "screw you!" to fandom, and anyone who might have anything potentially TOS-able in their journals, that he can say without having to actually commit himself to something he can't weasel out of. Taking him at his word, too, it also means that his much-ballyhooed commitment to "free speech" doesn't extend to actually rocking the boat or standing up for the LJ users who supposedly represent his constituency. (So why is he running again? Oh wait. For fun and for trolling opportunities, apparently.)
It's probably not fair to call
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
He'll invoke "free speech" right and left to defend his friends' trolling and name-calling, but he'll turn right around and "out" someone else for their own socially-unacceptable hobby, as long as it gets him some votes, notoriety or attention. And he'll do it while hiding behind a curtain of weasel-words and spin -- it's not HIM saying these things, just some anonymous person he's quoting! It's not HIS fault, it's just some other person saying these mean things that he's repeating. If he's acting like this during the campaign, why would he behave any differently once he's elected? Please, please vote.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I suspect he's doing his cause more harm than good, though, by poking HP fans with that particular stick. Because there are a LOT of them.
no subject
They shot themselves in the foot alright. And it's not just HP fandom that got riled up. It never fails: threaten or insult us from outside and all the splintered fandom factions will (very) briefly unite in an inspirational moment of beautiful harmony. And only when the dragon du jour lies slain, or at least gagged and bound in a corner, will we go back to our happy infighting.
Boy, would I like to see Jameth and his supporters gagged right now (I've been reading comments on some of the recent post on the mess, and am this close to banging my head against the keyboard.)
no subject
Oh, I think it's totally fair to call Jameth anti-fandom. Anyone who calls his main opponent a "lame ass Harry Potter Fandom dork" and runs an entire campaign on anti-fandom drivel is not going to represent us in any fair way once he gets elected.
On an positive note, it looks like fandom is waking up. Legomymalfoy is in the lead and 3000 votes ahead of Jameth. But she doesn't have 50% of the votes yet, so fandom, GO VOTE. Only two days left.
no subject
I honestly think he's helping us with this crap, though, because nothing gets people mobilized to vote against you like a steady barrage of insults!
no subject
*cough*
Yeah, can't do it.
Just. Pure. Slime.
(man, when I voted, I didn't know about *any* of this. I chose not to vote for him just based on his platform (which did contain things I would support more than some other platforms) and looking around his LJ - I didn't know anything about him, hadn't yet seen any of this. I just had other candidates I liked better. It's only in watching what they've run around doing and saying these last few days that has convinced me to 1) care and 2) actively campaign against him. Which is totally not something I like to do in elections)
Right now
no subject
no subject
Exactly they claim otherwise, but that's not what I saw (um, I saw what you said, not what they claim)
I mean, fandom is totally not monolithic and I see fandom debating about which candidate to support and, really, we don't agree on anything as a group and organizing us can be harder than hurting cats.
But you hurt one of our own? Especially a well-respected, well-written, intelligent, thoughtful one of our own? And you will feel our wrath.
There are behaviors I refuse to sit by and let go rewarded, and attacks like that are high up on my list.
no subject
Then again, neither is
I mean, yes, I did vote against
no subject
no subject
It's not like I care, anyhow. I'm not voting for anyone as much as against that asshole. *g*
no subject
Oh, totally. Me too. I don't know any of the candidates in the race, and I've been generally turned off by
But on the one hand I've got a candidate I'm uncertain about, and on the other hand a candidate whose posts disgust me, whose friends are actively harassing people I know and like while he doesn't lift a finger to stop them. I'm pretty openly "anyone but jameth" at this point.
no subject
That's pretty much me to.
Re: That's pretty much me to.
no subject
I'm honestly not that enthusiastic about
no subject
I saw the campaign site. Thought, ick, no. Hear about his crew's stunt. Thought, oh hell no.
I voted, can't do much else. :D
no subject
They totally cost *themselves* the election. They'd probably have walked away with it if it hadn't turned into trollapalooza.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I blame the parents though because aren't they the influence in these kids lives.
I've voted
So thank you jameth, for being such a douchebag.
Re: I've voted
He totally blew it for himself, the fool.