Entry tags:
Vorkosigans for the win! (Literally.)
There aren't very many years when I have really strong opinions on Hugo award winners, but this was one of those years when there was one category where I did have very strong opinions, and I'm completely delighted that the Vorkosigan books won for best series. (Full list of winners and nominees here.)
This isn't specifically because of my personal feelings about it (all the nominated series are ones that I either personally really enjoy or have heard good things about). It's because, of all the series on the list, it's the only one that I consider really, truly groundbreaking at the time it came out. Yes, the series has dated badly in some ways, but it's still kind of amazing to me that these books (the first half-dozen or so, anyway) were written in the 1980s. They stand out much less today, with so much more diversity of books available -- not just in the kinds of people in the books, but the kind of books that are around in the genre. But even by modern standards, these books are kind of weird (one part mil-SF, one part generation saga, one part comedy of manners). And at the time they were written, they were really, truly visionary. There just wasn't anything else like them. I think they were the first SF books I ever read where gay and agender and disabled characters were just there, as an ordinary human component of the future -- and yes, I know that is one aspect of the books that hasn't aged very well, but it was the 1980s! One thing that sticks in my head is LMB's account of what made her write Ethan of Athos: as a mom herself, she had a conversation with some male friends about whether men would be able to raise children by themselves (without a woman in the picture). She thought it was possible. Not a single one of her male friends agreed. I mean, literally didn't think it was a thing that could happen. So she went and wrote Ethan of Athos about an all-male planet to prove them wrong.
That's how much the world has changed in the last 30 years, and that's the milieu that the early books in the series were written in, and yet, books like Shards of Honor and the early Miles books are still completely readable today; they've dated a bit, but to me, anyway, they don't feel nearly as dated as the vast majority of 1970s/80s sci-fi does now.
So yeah, that's why I had strong feelings on that category, and that's why I'm really thrilled it went the way I was hoping it would go. The other series are excellent books. All of them have their own individual strengths; many of them do well what the Vorkosigan books don't. But I wanted LMB to win because, though they have their flaws, I think her books are really, truly visionary, groundbreaking, and influential in a way the others aren't, and that's what I think the Hugo awards (ideally) should recognize.
This isn't specifically because of my personal feelings about it (all the nominated series are ones that I either personally really enjoy or have heard good things about). It's because, of all the series on the list, it's the only one that I consider really, truly groundbreaking at the time it came out. Yes, the series has dated badly in some ways, but it's still kind of amazing to me that these books (the first half-dozen or so, anyway) were written in the 1980s. They stand out much less today, with so much more diversity of books available -- not just in the kinds of people in the books, but the kind of books that are around in the genre. But even by modern standards, these books are kind of weird (one part mil-SF, one part generation saga, one part comedy of manners). And at the time they were written, they were really, truly visionary. There just wasn't anything else like them. I think they were the first SF books I ever read where gay and agender and disabled characters were just there, as an ordinary human component of the future -- and yes, I know that is one aspect of the books that hasn't aged very well, but it was the 1980s! One thing that sticks in my head is LMB's account of what made her write Ethan of Athos: as a mom herself, she had a conversation with some male friends about whether men would be able to raise children by themselves (without a woman in the picture). She thought it was possible. Not a single one of her male friends agreed. I mean, literally didn't think it was a thing that could happen. So she went and wrote Ethan of Athos about an all-male planet to prove them wrong.
That's how much the world has changed in the last 30 years, and that's the milieu that the early books in the series were written in, and yet, books like Shards of Honor and the early Miles books are still completely readable today; they've dated a bit, but to me, anyway, they don't feel nearly as dated as the vast majority of 1970s/80s sci-fi does now.
So yeah, that's why I had strong feelings on that category, and that's why I'm really thrilled it went the way I was hoping it would go. The other series are excellent books. All of them have their own individual strengths; many of them do well what the Vorkosigan books don't. But I wanted LMB to win because, though they have their flaws, I think her books are really, truly visionary, groundbreaking, and influential in a way the others aren't, and that's what I think the Hugo awards (ideally) should recognize.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yeah, there are still so many days where "Forward momentum!" and "If Miles could do it, I can do it!" gets me through the rough spots.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
On a more personal level, I started with Memory and it (and the whole series) are still among my favorite books. Huge influence for me post-cancer on reshaping my life when you can't do what you thought you were going to be able to do.
no subject
no subject
When I put together my ballot, I ended up voting for almost all women in first place -- through no intention of my own, it just kind of happened that way. So I'm not all that surprised that Hugo voters as a whole also ended up voting for all women.
no subject
no subject
However, a bit disappointed in the Best novel winner. It's a sequel - and the 1st book won last year. I would have voted for Becky Chambers - as I found Closed and Common Orbit very well written and a wonderful world building
no subject
no subject
no subject
Anyway, yeah, I think of the nominees, the Bujold books are far and away the ones that deserved to win. Nothing against the others, but they can't really compare for sheer cultural impact.
no subject
But even before I actually started reading the series, I was very firm that Bujold should win. No one on that list has affected science fiction like her.
no subject
I hope you continue to enjoy it!
no subject
ETA: Basically I'm asking if you think there are some hard NOPEs for me there or not.
no subject
Having said all of THAT, though, the books overall are very optimistic about human nature, they're very much about making friends in adversity and accepting your responsibilities and generally being the best person you can, and the dark stuff is effectively there to give them things to deal with and rise above; these books aren't grimdark in the slightest. Also, many of them are different genres mashed up with sci-fi, e.g. one of the books is basically Jane Austen In Space, a couple are murder mysteries, etc.
I know your tastes in TV sci-fi better than book sci-fi. Let me know some of the books you like and I can tell you if these push the limits harder than other things you've read.
no subject
no subject
So yeah, I think you should give them a try! There is definitely dark stuff, but overall the books are very optimistic and very much about family.
You should know there is a big timeskip after the first two books. The main characters in the first two books are the parents of the main characters in the rest of the series. So you can either start with Shards of Honor (the first book in the series both in terms of chronology and writing order), or skip ahead to The Warrior's Apprentice (where the main cast for the rest of the series is established) and read the first two books later for backstory. People usually recommend reading in order because you get a ton of cultural and historical stuff from the first two books that is important for context in the later ones, and also, Cordelia, the main viewpoint character in the first two books, is very charming and likable. However, I did it the other way around and it worked fine for me. So ... whatever you'd prefer, really!
no subject
the characters tend to suffer from more of a "caring too much" problem. XD
my faaaavourite :D :D
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject