Entry tags:
Seen a few places ...
This looked like fun:
Give me a character and I'll tell you a piece of my personal headcanon.
Any fandom is welcome here, provided that I am reasonably familiar with it.
(Considering my absolute sucktasticness at answering comments lately, I can't promise that I'll respond to every comment, though.)
Give me a character and I'll tell you a piece of my personal headcanon.
Any fandom is welcome here, provided that I am reasonably familiar with it.
(Considering my absolute sucktasticness at answering comments lately, I can't promise that I'll respond to every comment, though.)

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ronon has an artist's soul in a warrior's body. He was a quiet, bookish child, and (in a different time, a different place) would have been very happy as a sculptor or a poet.
But he was drafted fairly young into a war he didn't choose. And he turned out to be good at it. And then there was nothing but survival, for so many years that he almost forgot the child who used to spend hours being enthralled by the subtle play of light and shade above a courtyard pool.
Almost. But not quite.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
He grew up always believing that he had to be able to let go of anything (money, people, things) at a moment's notice. He envisions himself as a ninja slipping around the boundaries of society, footloose and fancy-free, capable of dropping out of sight instantly if he has to. In reality, though, he's a lot more tied down than he wants to admit.
no subject
no subject
I think my favorite Ursa headcanon is that she's living on a little farm in some part of the Fire Nation or Earth Kingdom so rural and remote that no one will ever find her, and she has a husband and kids, and she's happy.
But I'm also intrigued by the idea of an Ursa who is far darker and more like Azula than anyone ever writes her -- an Ursa who exists as the ever-supportive mother figure through Zuko's idealistic, rose-colored memory glasses, but is actually a very ruthless, frightening person. She's not actually evil -- she loves her children, and misses them -- but she hasn't come back because she doesn't want to, and she doesn't feel terribly guilty about it.
no subject
This is the impulse that draws her to Neal. The unexpected thing isn't that she's attracted to him, because even she could have predicted that, if she'd looked back over her history of dating volatile, dangerous, sometimes abusive men. No, the unexpected thing is that she really likes him as a person, and they make very good friends. As lovers, however, they are terrifyingly combustible -- the sort of relationship that burns very bright and hot for a short period of time, and ends up with both people getting burned. But the underlying warmth of friendship is still there, which is something she hasn't had in her past relationships. Intellectually, she knows full well that she and Neal don't have a future together -- that it's a casual, fast-burning love affair. But she has this genuine warmth for him, and vice versa, and when they stop trying to be Boyfriend and Girlfriend and just relax, they get along really well (sort of like Neal and Peter get along whenever they forget they're supposed to be on opposite sides). And this is what keeps her from either severing things completely, or very firmly stuffing Neal into the Friend box and leaving him there: because she hasn't had that warmth and mutual affection with past boyfriends. It's just not the sort of affection that leads to a marriage and a house in the suburbs. As soon as they start wanting things from each other, it disintegrates. And yet, she would totally trust him at her back in a gunfight, and if something really devastating happened, like, say, her mom died, Neal is probably the first person she'd call for a sympathetic shoulder to cry on (possibly followed by a 2 a.m. tryst with underwear flung all over the room ... possibly followed after that by a giant catastrophic fight and not talking to each other for a month). It's precisely that kind of weird relationship.
no subject
Sara has a danger-junkie streak bordering on self-destructive.
From "Burke's Seven"
Peter: Could be dangerous.
Sara: Could be fun.
Definitely a character defining moment.
I ship Neal/Sara like burning, and I'm rarity among Sara fans in that I think that the two of them could work long term. (They'd both need to shift and change a little, but that would be true of Neal and anyone he settled down with--including Kate, had she lived.) However, I love what you say here. As I said, I'm a shipper, so I won't complain if the writers hook Neal and Sara back up. But what I'd really like is for the relationship to continue in the vein of 3x15 and 4x04. It's really wonderful to see how much intimate and honest they are with each other now. Romantic love is great, but friendship gets short changed far too often. I like that Neal and Sara are closer as friends.
I love how mature they can be with each other. Sure, not always, but sometimes. Their breakup scene was incredible for that. Sara, not acting betrayed or demanding that Neal change or choose, just making it clear that he had gone beyond where she could follow, and firmly, gently breaking it off. And Neal not making excuses or trying to change her mind, but accepting what she had to do. 4x04 was that all over again without the pain. (Well, a little pain.) Sara not blaming Neal, but making it clear that he hurt her and explaining why. And Neal acknowledging that.
And now I want all the Neal and Sara friendship fic in the world.
no subject
no subject
I think the main thing I adore about Sara/Neal, though, is that it's one of the least heteronormative m/f relationships I've seen on TV, at least in the cop/action/scifi genre. (Though Fiona/Michael on Burn Notice also comes close, which is probably one of the reasons why I like them too.) They simply do not follow the general pattern for TV m/f relationships (a long period of UST followed by dating and/or sex with an eye to a long-term relationship leading to marriage and kids). And I wonder if that's one reason why fandom reacted badly to them, because a lot of the criticism that I've seen leveled against the relationship basically boils down to "not standard enough": they moved too fast, they did things in the wrong order, they don't act like a dating boyfriend/girlfriend pair are "supposed" to.
But I love that about them. I've said this elsewhere, but Sara/Neal are one of the most real-feeling couples that I've seen on TV for their general ages and lifestyles -- it really feels like a relationship between 20something/30something professionals in the city.
I'm not gonna say it's impossible for them to have a stable, long-term relationship. I think my view of their prospects is less rosy than yours, but on the other hand, I think they have a really solid grounding for it: they genuinely like and appreciate each other, and they communicate well, and both of them obviously feel that the sex is hot like burning. So who knows? Lots of couples go far on much less than that. Most of the Sara/Neal futurefic I've encountered feels OOC to me, especially for Sara (mostly because it embraces a far more wifely role for her than I think Sara herself would ever embrace, or Neal would want for her), but that just means the field is wide open for Sara/Neal fic that puts a slightly different spin on it. (Which now I kinda want to write ...)
And I've always had a thing for relationships that are highly nonstandard/atypical, and mildly incomprehensible to everyone around the couple, but work really well for the couple themselves.
Screed (or Natalie)
no subject
one of the reasons why I absolutely hate the way the fandom (a lot of it, anyway) deals with Sara
Oh my lord, you are preaching to the choir on this one. The Sara hate on lj/dw really makes me feel alienated from the fandom, and keeps me from participating as much as I'd like. It's not just that they hate a character I love. So much of the hate is gender based (calling her a bitch, deriding her for her sexuality, holding her up to ridiculous double standards) that I think it's part of a much larger problem, and I just can't feel comfortable.
I totally agree about Neal/Sara not being very heteronormative. It helps that neither character is particularly heteronormative to start with. I've talked about this before, but I love what White Collar does with gender. I love that Neal is not traditionally masculine, and that those traits are presented as cool. It's cool that Neal knows fashion and can cook a gourmet meal. I love that Sara is aggressive, ambitious, occasionally abrasive, and willing to speak her mind, and the show itself never portrays her as a shrew for it. A male character would get away with behaving this way, so why shouldn't Sara?
So yeah, I think their relationship challenges what's "supposed" to be on a number of levels. (Sara should be nicer, she should pine more, they shouldn't be so sexual, they shouldn't be so eager not to define their relationship.)
Which now I kinda want to write ...
I will only encourage this.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-11 12:26 am (UTC)(link)Or Haplo if you prefer. ^_^;;
...I know this is like a week later so apologies~
*slinks back into the shadows*