Entry tags:
Oh, right! We also watched Supernatural!
Towards the end of last season, I kinda disengaged emotionally from SPN. I didn't realize just how much I'd disengaged until watching this episode. I looked forward to the episode, enjoyed the episode, but I'm really not fannish about it at all anymore.
I've gotten to the point with SPN where I think I'm watching to laugh at the OH JOHN RINGO NO factor as much as to enjoy the show itself. Which is a little unfair to the show, because most of its problems are pretty much typical tropes of genre TV, and it is well written and fun; there was a lot of fun in the episode, especially the total creepiness of not having any idea what was going on or what was stalking Dean (or even if he was really out of Hell, or dreaming, or what). I'll freely admit that I *MUCH* preferred the urban-legend focus of the first season to the whole theological, end-of-the-world, meaning-of-existence thing they've got going now, but, hey, I'm curious to see where they take it, and I like the angel!
But ... it's gotten to the point where I just can't not point and laugh at all the places where the show goes to that OH JOHN RINGO NO place. I'm not sure if I'd go so far as to say that it bothers me -- I really am more amused by it than anything else -- and any one individual thing (the half-naked girl in Sam's room, Dean slapping a demoness) wouldn't be notable by itself, but it's just all of them, all together, in pretty much every episode ... and the previouslies really drive that point home, being basically a parade of injured/killed/abused women. I might also point out that the angel -- a character who will presumably be recurring, who is insanely powerful, quite likable and, unlike most of the guest stars in the episode, wasn't hurt or killed or objectified or evil -- is a man. OH SHOW. My expectations ... so low! And yet you keep underwhelming them!
I do realize that it's basically an action/horror show and they're working within the tropes of the genre. But it doesn't have to be this way in a genre show; SGA, of all shows, just had two back-to-back action episodes featuring female characters that had NONE of these issues. It's not that every episode has to be perfectly gender-neutral or that women shouldn't ever be victims or stripped down to their underwear, it's just ... must EVERY EPISODE be like that?! wtf, Kripke?
I've gotten to the point with SPN where I think I'm watching to laugh at the OH JOHN RINGO NO factor as much as to enjoy the show itself. Which is a little unfair to the show, because most of its problems are pretty much typical tropes of genre TV, and it is well written and fun; there was a lot of fun in the episode, especially the total creepiness of not having any idea what was going on or what was stalking Dean (or even if he was really out of Hell, or dreaming, or what). I'll freely admit that I *MUCH* preferred the urban-legend focus of the first season to the whole theological, end-of-the-world, meaning-of-existence thing they've got going now, but, hey, I'm curious to see where they take it, and I like the angel!
But ... it's gotten to the point where I just can't not point and laugh at all the places where the show goes to that OH JOHN RINGO NO place. I'm not sure if I'd go so far as to say that it bothers me -- I really am more amused by it than anything else -- and any one individual thing (the half-naked girl in Sam's room, Dean slapping a demoness) wouldn't be notable by itself, but it's just all of them, all together, in pretty much every episode ... and the previouslies really drive that point home, being basically a parade of injured/killed/abused women. I might also point out that the angel -- a character who will presumably be recurring, who is insanely powerful, quite likable and, unlike most of the guest stars in the episode, wasn't hurt or killed or objectified or evil -- is a man. OH SHOW. My expectations ... so low! And yet you keep underwhelming them!
I do realize that it's basically an action/horror show and they're working within the tropes of the genre. But it doesn't have to be this way in a genre show; SGA, of all shows, just had two back-to-back action episodes featuring female characters that had NONE of these issues. It's not that every episode has to be perfectly gender-neutral or that women shouldn't ever be victims or stripped down to their underwear, it's just ... must EVERY EPISODE be like that?! wtf, Kripke?

no subject
It is a problem when they make me guilty for liking the cool, hot (white) angel-dude, however... (though I don't think he was really less objectified than the new Ruby? The problem is objectification of men just doesn't work the same way as objectification of women, because the social context/privilege is different...)
no subject
no subject
So I'm not buying it.
no subject
I did like the angel, though! And, yeah, I think you're right that he was still being objectified, but in, um, a less pandering kind of way, perhaps? I mean, the women in SGA are all dressed up in black leather, but I don't find it at all objectionable -- the men are all wearing black leather too, and for every half-naked female guest star (which have been MUCH less prevalent of late, too!), there's a shot of Ronon's chest or Rodney's shoulders. *g* I can be very cheaply bought. XD
The new Ruby, oh dear. I did not like the old one on her first appearance, but all the reasons that I didn't like her (too Buffy, too young to be a demon hunter, etc) went out the window when I found out who she really was, and I liked her just fine by the end -- I thought she did "hard and questionably evil" very well, especially for someone who was, on the surface, so young and pretty. The new Ruby, though ... I don't think she's doing a good job of projecting "hard and evil" at all. Her voice was so querulous, and if she was trying to mimic the other actress's mannerisms and expressions (as one would expect with the same demon inside her) I sure couldn't tell! I guess I ought to give it another couple of episodes and see if she can manage to exude the same callous and world-weary vibe that the other one did, but I'm not feeling it so far.
no subject
Yes! I didn't mind the big YED myth-arc in the first season at all; it was very tied up with finding John and Sam's past and with the work that they were doing. But "all demon all the time" is doing absolutely nothing for me. At least the second season had the Roadhouse and Dean's brushes with the law and a few other long story arcs to compete with the demon stuff. The more it goes on, the more it's just all about the demons and this sort of weird quasi-theological thing they're doing. In this particular context, I don't care about the meaning of life and existence and whether or not Christian theology is literally and metaphysically true. In fact, I actively don't want those sorts of questions intruding into my enjoyment of watching pretty boys killing werewolves and banshees, dammit! *g*
no subject
no subject
Mostly, I was just amused by this episode and realized I may have fallen out of love because it didn't engage me the way it used to. :(
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
he was still being objectified, but in, um, a less pandering kind of way, perhaps?
That's the problem, though - you pander to fanboys and fangirls in different ways. Fanboys want to see women in tight-fitting revealing clothing showing T&A as they kick ass; fangirls do enjoy that with our boys (mmmm Farscape), but I think we're just, if not more, turned on by trench-coats and lightning and big woobie brooding eyes. The angel char is far more appealing and attractive to me like this than if he'd shimmied in wearing tight leather, and I'm pretty sure that TPTB are aware of this. The angel was being objectified for us, while the psychic and new Ruby were being objectified for guys. I don't know if that makes it defensible or excusable, but...it's complicated?
Yeah, I actually quite liked Ruby last season - not so much her woobieness at the end, but the "hard and questionably evil" was fun. The new one I didn't see enough of to get a handle on, one way or another; she didn't come across that great, but I'm willing to give her a chance.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
So would I. I think the wider cast stopped it from being so repetitive. I'm not sure I'll even bother with this season. Well, unless Ellen turns up in an episode and Samantha Ferris hasn't mentioned any on her blog. :(
no subject
I noticed the new Ruby's insecurity too-- I thought it was because she's a little scared of her pet hunter now. If he decides she's not actually on his side, she's toast, and she knows it.
no subject
I did greatly enjoy him as a character -- I must admit that I'm not really on board with the theology on the show, though. I can certainly enjoy it if it's there from the get-go (Good Omens, anyone?) but right now I feel like the show's thrown me a curve ball I don't want.
But that's an excellent point with New!Ruby. It's difficult to judge her based on just one scene; I'll have to wait and see how she interacts with people other than Sam. (Also, demonslayer-Sam is too much fun!)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Red Shirt Girls
Season Two had me thinking, 'If Sam say's '..but my destiny...' one more time, I'm going to scream. I like Sam, but he got really whiny in Season two.
Season Three: I was NOT happy about Dean's 'deal' at all. And taking a page from Star Trek, enter the 'Red Shirt' (girls). Oh, pretty girl in show. Oh, pretty dead girl at end of show. hmm.
Season Four? I like that they finally acknowledge the existence of angels. Lot's of people have no problem with the demons, but balk at angels? Come on..... And what is wrong with having a CAPABLE female character? One that doesn't look and act like the stereotype. They actually had a few female characters I really liked. They were pretty, (but not bombshells if you know what I mean) smart and likable, but also very dead very soon.
*sigh* I'll still watch (until my cable net-work quits carrying it in October) *ahem* Like I said, I'd still watch, but the only show I'm a true fan of is SGA and they're taking it off! !@%#@*!!
I am going off to sulk. I'm still not over the cancellation.
Anyway, I know what you mean!